The importance of changing our education system and ensuring high quality learning for all children was made paramount by the article, Law of Unintended Consequences, which discusses the unintended consequences of the No Child Left Behind Act. While the NCLB act intended to ensure America’s children were exceeding academically outshining the children of other countries has had the opposite effect, and it is now clear that should the NCLB act remain as it is, the majority of America’s children will be left behind. Marian Wright Edelman describes a few of the unintended consequences in her statement,
- NCLB's narrow focus on "high stakes" testing and its overreliance on sanctions that punish struggling schools encouraged states to lower standards, districts to narrow the curriculum, schools to push at-risk children out of school by suspending or expelling them prior to test day, and teachers to teach to the test. No child—regardless of background—benefits from mindless test preparation day in and day out at the hands of often overwhelmed, underprepared, and poorly supported teachers. (Edelman, 2011)
- …congress will need to go beyond the Blueprint and include provisions for education excellence our most vulnerable children: children in concentrated poverty, children in need of full-day kindergarten, children at risk of dropping out or being pushed out of school, children in juvenile detention, and children in foster care. (Edelman, 2011)
While I did not gain any new insights, I did get a better understanding of the inequity of funding and high quality programs, as well as a better understanding of the effect of lack of political support. Additionally, I was shocked at the amount of programs and support some politicians wish to cut from children and families, as I see investments into America’s children as investments into our nation’s future, and providing for children who cannot provide form themselves just basic humanity.
“Giving children their basic human rights to adequate nutrition, health care, and education should be a no brainer” (Children's Defense Fund, 2011).
References:
Children's Defense Fund. (2011, February 14). Investing In and Not Cutting Programs for Children is Key to Our Economic Future. Retrieved April 9, 2011, from Children's Defense Fund: http://www.childrensdefense.org/newsroom/cdf-in-the-news/press-releases/2011/investing-in-and-not-cutting.html
Children's Defense Fund. (2011, March). Monthly Newletter March 2011. Retrieved April 9, 2011, from Children's Defense Fund: http://cdf.childrensdefense.org/site/MessageViewer?em_id=23121.0&dlv_id=0
Edelman, M. W. (2011, February 11). Law of Unintended Consequences. Retrieved April 9, 2011, from HUFFPOST EDUCATION: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marian-wright-edelman/law-of-unintended-consequ_b_821819.html
Sondi,
ReplyDeleteI completely agree that it is amazing that our government likes to take money from programs from that will benefit children and families but can come up with money for unnecessary studies or other research. It is amazing that they want the children of this country to compete in the field of education but don't want to invest money in what children need in order to compete. Great points in your post and very informative.
Sondi,
ReplyDeleteThe intentions of the NCLB Act were good, but isn't working as you say. The teachers at the elementary school where I work are in a frenzy right now preparing for New Jersey Standardized testing in April/May. Unfortunately this district counts on high test results. It is what sells houses. Prospective residents choose their homes based on the test results of the elementary schools. Teachers feel district and community pressure to perform. Teachers are also in competition with each other and compare their class scores. It's crazy! They have been drilling the students for weeks!